Free SKILL.md scraped from GitHub. Clone the repo or copy the file directly into your Claude Code skills directory.
npx versuz@latest install jmagly-aiwg-agentic-code-addons-aiwg-utils-skills-customize-contribute-backgit clone https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg.gitcp aiwg/SKILL.MD ~/.claude/skills/jmagly-aiwg-agentic-code-addons-aiwg-utils-skills-customize-contribute-back/SKILL.md---
namespace: aiwg
name: customize-contribute-back
platforms: [all]
description: Contribute a user's AIWG customization back upstream as a PR — reviews for general applicability, creates branch, opens PR
---
# Customize Contribute Back
You help users contribute a customization from their fork back to the upstream AIWG repo. You first assess whether the customization is generally useful (not just personal), then create a feature branch, commit, and open a PR.
## Triggers
- "PR this back to AIWG"
- "contribute this upstream"
- "submit this agent to the main repo"
- "open a PR to AIWG"
- "share this with the AIWG project"
- "could this be useful for everyone?"
## Trigger Patterns Reference
| Pattern | Example | Action |
|---------|---------|--------|
| Explicit PR | "PR this back to AIWG" | Assess → branch → PR |
| Contribution question | "could this be useful for everyone?" | Assess only, ask to proceed |
| Submit | "submit this skill upstream" | Assess → branch → PR |
## Behavior
When triggered:
1. **Identify what to contribute** — ask if not clear:
> "Which customization would you like to contribute? (e.g., the domain-specialist agent, the my-conventions rule)"
2. **Assess for general applicability**:
- Review the file(s) in question
- Ask: is this useful to anyone installing AIWG, or is it specific to this user's context?
- **Personal signals** (do NOT contribute): references to the user's name, team, specific internal tools, personal preferences ("always call me X"), org-specific vocabulary
- **General signals** (good candidate): adds new capability, improves an existing agent/skill for a common use case, fixes a gap in the framework
If personal: decline gracefully:
> "This looks specific to you — it references [X]. That's perfect as a private customization but wouldn't be a fit for the main repo. Keep it in your fork."
If general: confirm with user before proceeding:
> "This looks generally useful. Want me to open a PR to jmagly/aiwg?"
3. **Create feature branch**:
```bash
git -C <edgePath> checkout -b feat/contribute-<name>
git -C <edgePath> add <file(s)>
git -C <edgePath> commit -m "<conventional-commit-message>"
git -C <edgePath> push origin feat/contribute-<name>
```
Conventional commit format: `feat(<scope>): <description>` — scope is the addon/framework area (e.g., `aiwg-utils`, `sdlc`, `skills`).
4. **Open PR** via `gh`:
```bash
gh pr create \
--repo jmagly/aiwg \
--head <user>:feat/contribute-<name> \
--title "<conventional commit title>" \
--body "<description>"
```
PR body template:
```markdown
## Summary
[What this adds/changes and why it's useful for AIWG users generally]
## Changes
- [File: what it does]
## Testing
- Deployed locally via `aiwg use all`
- [Any specific testing done]
```
5. **Report**:
```
PR opened: https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg/pull/NNN
Title: feat(aiwg-utils): [title]
Branch: feat/contribute-<name>
The PR is ready for review. You can continue customizing on main — this branch is separate.
```
## Examples
### Example 1: Generally useful agent
**User**: "I built a terraform-specialist agent — could this be useful for others?"
**Assessment**: Not user-specific, generally useful for infra teams → confirm
**Action**: Create branch → commit `feat(aiwg-utils): add terraform-specialist agent` → push → `gh pr create`
**Response**: "PR opened at jmagly/aiwg. The Terraform specialist agent looks like a solid contribution."
### Example 2: Personal rule
**User**: "PR my my-conventions rule back to AIWG"
**Assessment**: File contains "always know I'm Joe from Acme Corp" — personal
**Response**: "This rule references you by name and mentions Acme Corp — it's a perfect personal customization but not a fit for the main repo where it wouldn't apply to other users. It stays in your fork."
### Example 3: Generally useful skill improvement
**User**: "I improved the aiwg-sync skill to handle more edge cases — contribute it?"
**Assessment**: Improvement to existing skill, generally applicable → confirm
**Action**: Create branch → commit → PR
## Clarification Prompts
- "Which file(s) should I include in the PR?"
- "This looks generally useful — want me to open a PR to jmagly/aiwg?"
- "The assessment: [reason]. Should I proceed with the PR anyway?"
## References
- @$AIWG_ROOT/CONTRIBUTING.md — Contribution guidelines
- @$AIWG_ROOT/docs/customization/fork-workflow.md — Fork workflow docs