Free SKILL.md scraped from GitHub. Clone the repo or copy the file directly into your Claude Code skills directory.
npx versuz@latest install teotoplak-tempo-agents-skills-gsd-research-phasegit clone https://github.com/teotoplak/tempo.gitcp tempo/SKILL.MD ~/.claude/skills/teotoplak-tempo-agents-skills-gsd-research-phase/SKILL.md---
name: "gsd-research-phase"
description: "Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use $gsd-plan-phase instead)"
metadata:
short-description: "Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use $gsd-plan-phase instead)"
---
<codex_skill_adapter>
## A. Skill Invocation
- This skill is invoked by mentioning `$gsd-research-phase`.
- Treat all user text after `$gsd-research-phase` as `{{GSD_ARGS}}`.
- If no arguments are present, treat `{{GSD_ARGS}}` as empty.
## B. AskUserQuestion → request_user_input Mapping
GSD workflows use `AskUserQuestion` (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex `request_user_input`:
Parameter mapping:
- `header` → `header`
- `question` → `question`
- Options formatted as `"Label" — description` → `{label: "Label", description: "description"}`
- Generate `id` from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscores
Batched calls:
- `AskUserQuestion([q1, q2])` → single `request_user_input` with multiple entries in `questions[]`
Multi-select workaround:
- Codex has no `multiSelect`. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.
Execute mode fallback:
- When `request_user_input` is rejected (Execute mode), present a plain-text numbered list and pick a reasonable default.
## C. Task() → spawn_agent Mapping
GSD workflows use `Task(...)` (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
- `Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y")` → `spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")`
- `Task(model="...")` → omit (Codex uses per-role config, not inline model selection)
- `fork_context: false` by default — GSD agents load their own context via `<files_to_read>` blocks
Parallel fan-out:
- Spawn multiple agents → collect agent IDs → `wait(ids)` for all to complete
Result parsing:
- Look for structured markers in agent output: `CHECKPOINT`, `PLAN COMPLETE`, `SUMMARY`, etc.
- `close_agent(id)` after collecting results from each agent
</codex_skill_adapter>
<objective>
Research how to implement a phase. Spawns gsd-phase-researcher agent with phase context.
**Note:** This is a standalone research command. For most workflows, use `$gsd-plan-phase` which integrates research automatically.
**Use this command when:**
- You want to research without planning yet
- You want to re-research after planning is complete
- You need to investigate before deciding if a phase is feasible
**Orchestrator role:** Parse phase, validate against roadmap, check existing research, gather context, spawn researcher agent, present results.
**Why subagent:** Research burns context fast (WebSearch, Context7 queries, source verification). Fresh 200k context for investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction.
</objective>
<context>
Phase number: {{GSD_ARGS}} (required)
Normalize phase input in step 1 before any directory lookups.
</context>
<process>
## 0. Initialize Context
```bash
INIT=$(node "/Users/teo/src/tempo/.codex/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" init phase-op "{{GSD_ARGS}}")
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
```
Extract from init JSON: `phase_dir`, `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `phase_found`, `commit_docs`, `has_research`, `state_path`, `requirements_path`, `context_path`, `research_path`.
Resolve researcher model:
```bash
RESEARCHER_MODEL=$(node "/Users/teo/src/tempo/.codex/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" resolve-model gsd-phase-researcher --raw)
```
## 1. Validate Phase
```bash
PHASE_INFO=$(node "/Users/teo/src/tempo/.codex/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" roadmap get-phase "${phase_number}")
```
**If `found` is false:** Error and exit. **If `found` is true:** Extract `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `goal` from JSON.
## 2. Check Existing Research
```bash
ls .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null
```
**If exists:** Offer: 1) Update research, 2) View existing, 3) Skip. Wait for response.
**If doesn't exist:** Continue.
## 3. Gather Phase Context
Use paths from INIT (do not inline file contents in orchestrator context):
- `requirements_path`
- `context_path`
- `state_path`
Present summary with phase description and what files the researcher will load.
## 4. Spawn gsd-phase-researcher Agent
Research modes: ecosystem (default), feasibility, implementation, comparison.
```markdown
<research_type>
Phase Research — investigating HOW to implement a specific phase well.
</research_type>
<key_insight>
The question is NOT "which library should I use?"
The question is: "What do I not know that I don't know?"
For this phase, discover:
- What's the established architecture pattern?
- What libraries form the standard stack?
- What problems do people commonly hit?
- What's SOTA vs what Claude's training thinks is SOTA?
- What should NOT be hand-rolled?
</key_insight>
<objective>
Research implementation approach for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
Mode: ecosystem
</objective>
<files_to_read>
- {requirements_path} (Requirements)
- {context_path} (Phase context from discuss-phase, if exists)
- {state_path} (Prior project decisions and blockers)
</files_to_read>
<additional_context>
**Phase description:** {phase_description}
</additional_context>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md will be loaded by `$gsd-plan-phase` which uses specific sections:
- `## Standard Stack` → Plans use these libraries
- `## Architecture Patterns` → Task structure follows these
- `## Don't Hand-Roll` → Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems
- `## Common Pitfalls` → Verification steps check for these
- `## Code Examples` → Task actions reference these patterns
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."
</downstream_consumer>
<quality_gate>
Before declaring complete, verify:
- [ ] All domains investigated (not just some)
- [ ] Negative claims verified with official docs
- [ ] Multiple sources for critical claims
- [ ] Confidence levels assigned honestly
- [ ] Section names match what plan-phase expects
</quality_gate>
<output>
Write to: .planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md
</output>
```
```
Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Research Phase {phase}"
)
```
## 5. Handle Agent Return
**`## RESEARCH COMPLETE`:** Display summary, offer: Plan phase, Dig deeper, Review full, Done.
**`## CHECKPOINT REACHED`:** Present to user, get response, spawn continuation.
**`## RESEARCH INCONCLUSIVE`:** Show what was attempted, offer: Add context, Try different mode, Manual.
## 6. Spawn Continuation Agent
```markdown
<objective>
Continue research for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
</objective>
<prior_state>
<files_to_read>
- .planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md (Existing research)
</files_to_read>
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>
```
```
Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Continue research Phase {phase}"
)
```
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Phase validated against roadmap
- [ ] Existing research checked
- [ ] gsd-phase-researcher spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] User knows next steps
</success_criteria>