Free SKILL.md scraped from GitHub. Clone the repo or copy the file directly into your Claude Code skills directory.
npx versuz@latest install vintersong-nova-cognition-framework-forgemaster-library-game-dev-playtest-reportgit clone https://github.com/Vintersong/NOVA-Cognition-Framework.gitcp NOVA-Cognition-Framework/SKILL.MD ~/.claude/skills/vintersong-nova-cognition-framework-forgemaster-library-game-dev-playtest-report/SKILL.md@@verification: unverified @@capabilities: * --- name: playtest-report description: "Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis." argument-hint: "[new|analyze path-to-notes]" user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write --- When invoked with `new`, generate this template: ```markdown # Playtest Report ## Session Info - **Date**: [Date] - **Build**: [Version/Commit] - **Duration**: [Time played] - **Tester**: [Name/ID] - **Platform**: [PC/Console/Mobile] - **Input Method**: [KB+M / Gamepad / Touch] - **Session Type**: [First time / Returning / Targeted test] ## Test Focus [What specific features or flows were being tested] ## First Impressions (First 5 minutes) - **Understood the goal?** [Yes/No/Partially] - **Understood the controls?** [Yes/No/Partially] - **Emotional response**: [Engaged/Confused/Bored/Frustrated/Excited] - **Notes**: [Observations] ## Gameplay Flow ### What worked well - [Observation 1] - [Observation 2] ### Pain points - [Issue 1 -- Severity: High/Medium/Low] - [Issue 2 -- Severity: High/Medium/Low] ### Confusion points - [Where the player was confused and why] ### Moments of delight - [What surprised or pleased the player] ## Bugs Encountered | # | Description | Severity | Reproducible | |---|-------------|----------|-------------| ## Feature-Specific Feedback ### [Feature 1] - **Understood purpose?** [Yes/No] - **Found engaging?** [Yes/No] - **Suggestions**: [Tester suggestions] ## Quantitative Data (if available) - **Deaths**: [Count and locations] - **Time per area**: [Breakdown] - **Items used**: [What and when] - **Features discovered vs missed**: [List] ## Overall Assessment - **Would play again?** [Yes/No/Maybe] - **Difficulty**: [Too Easy / Just Right / Too Hard] - **Pacing**: [Too Slow / Good / Too Fast] - **Session length preference**: [Shorter / Good / Longer] ## Top 3 Priorities from this session 1. [Most important finding] 2. [Second priority] 3. [Third priority] ``` When invoked with `analyze`, read the raw notes, cross-reference with existing design documents, and fill in the template above with structured findings. Flag any playtest observations that conflict with design intent.