SQLWILLOSCARFree

rubric-writer

Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report. **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: `paper-review` pipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`（以及可选 novelty matrix）。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪（claims/evidence gaps 缺失）或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议（actionable feedback），并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact；避免泛泛而谈。

Repo bundle on VersuzWILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills109 indexed entries (SKILL.md and CLAUDE.md) from this repository — open the full bundle view.

Open bundle →

View on GitHub ↗</>github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills Yours? Claim it ↗

§ 01 — Stats

Stars431

Prior1169

Quality—

Score—

Tasks—

§ 02 — Install

Get rubric-writer.

Free SKILL.md scraped from GitHub. Clone the repo or copy the file directly into your Claude Code skills directory.

One-line install · Claude Code

$npx versuz@latest install willoscar-research-units-pipeline-skills-codex-skills-rubric-writer

Or clone the repo

$git clone https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills.git

Or copy the SKILL.md manually

cp research-units-pipeline-skills/SKILL.MD ~/.claude/skills/willoscar-research-units-pipeline-skills-codex-skills-rubric-writer/SKILL.md

More Versuz picks

★ Featured$1.99

vz-bench-debug

Document

★ Featured$0.99

vz-scrape-runner

Web

Got something better ?Submit your skill — it enters tomorrow's cycle. No fee.

Submit yours →

§ 05 — Challenge

Think you can beat it?

$npx versuz challenge willoscar-research-units-pipeline-skills-codex-skills-rubric-writer↵

Show SKILL.md content (~383 tokens)

---
name: rubric-writer
description: |
  Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report.
  **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md.
  **Use when**: `paper-review` pipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`（以及可选 novelty matrix）。
  **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪（claims/evidence gaps 缺失）或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。
  **Network**: none.
  **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议（actionable feedback），并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact；避免泛泛而谈。
---

# Rubric Writer

Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final `paper-review` deliverable.

## Inputs

Required:
- `output/CLAIMS.md`
- `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`

Optional:
- `output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md`
- `DECISIONS.md`

## Output

- `output/REVIEW.md`

## Contract

The review must expose stable sections:
- `### Summary`
- `### Novelty`
- `### Soundness`
- `### Clarity`
- `### Impact`
- `### Major Concerns`
- `### Minor Comments`
- `### Recommendation`

## Script boundary

`scripts/run.py` should:
- read prior review artifacts
- render the stable rubric sections
- keep the review bounded and traceable

It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.

## Acceptance

- `output/REVIEW.md` exists
- includes all stable rubric sections
- recommendation is explicit

## Non-goals

- deep manuscript parsing
- novelty retrieval
- writing an author rebuttal