Free SKILL.md scraped from GitHub. Clone the repo or copy the file directly into your Claude Code skills directory.
npx versuz@latest install writing-releasesgit clone https://github.com/medusajs/medusa.gitcp -r medusa/.claude/skills/writing-releases ~/.claude/skills/writing-releases/--- name: writing-releases description: Writes GitHub release notes for Medusa releases in the established style. Use when generating a draft release description from a list of commits and PR metadata. Covers minimal patch releases, single-highlight releases, multi-feature releases, and releases with breaking changes. --- # Writing Medusa Release Notes Generates GitHub release notes from commit/PR data in the established Medusa style. ## Constraints - **Full Changelog link is mandatory** — always the last line: `**Full Changelog**: [vPREV...vNEW](compare-url)` - **No top-level Breaking Changes section** — breaking changes are embedded inside their Highlight subsection with `🚧 Breaking change`, never in a separate `## Breaking Changes` heading - **Bullet format is strict** — every entry in Features/Bugs/Chores/etc. must include author link and PR link (see `reference/format.md`) - **Highlights are not a summary of all PRs** — only significant changes qualify; routine additions go in Features/Bugs bullets only (see `reference/release-types.md`) - **No emojis** — the only permitted emoji is `🚧` on breaking change highlights; use none anywhere else - **Code block required for actionable steps** — if a highlight requires the developer to install a package, run a command, or update config, include a fenced code block with the exact command(s) ## Load Reference Files When Needed > **Load at least one reference file before writing.** | Task | Load | |------|------| | Formatting sections and bullets | `reference/format.md` | | Deciding whether to write Highlights, and identifying breaking changes | `reference/release-types.md` | | Writing the Highlights section | `reference/highlights.md` | ## Quick Reference ### Release type decision | Commit set | Release type | |-----------|-------------| | Only routine fixes/chores, no user-facing impact | Minimal — no Highlights section | | One important change is the main reason for the release | Single Highlight | | Multiple significant features or fixes | Multi-Highlight | | Any PR with a minor changeset in `.changeset/` | Add `🚧` to that Highlight | ### Section order (include only sections with entries) ``` ## Highlights ## Features ## Bugs ## Documentation ## Chores ## Other Changes ## New Contributors **Full Changelog**: [vPREV...vNEW](url) ``` ## Common Mistakes - [ ] Adding a title or `# Heading` at the top — release notes have no title, start directly with the first section - [ ] Adding a `## Breaking Changes` top-level section — embed inside the Highlight instead - [ ] Putting a routine bug fix or small feature addition in Highlights - [ ] Missing the Full Changelog link at the end - [ ] Bullet missing author link or PR link - [ ] Using PR title verbatim as a Highlight heading — write a descriptive outcome-focused title - [ ] Treating every `feat:` commit as a Highlight candidate - [ ] Using emojis anywhere except `🚧` on breaking change highlights - [ ] Writing a Highlight that requires a developer action (install, run, config change) without a fenced code block ## Reference Files ``` reference/format.md — section order, bullet format, commit prefix → section mapping reference/release-types.md — when to add Highlights, breaking change detection, highlight criteria reference/highlights.md — how to write Highlight subsections ```