Free SKILL.md scraped from GitHub. Clone the repo or copy the file directly into your Claude Code skills directory.
npx versuz@latest install zubair-trabzada-ai-marketing-claude-skills-market-reportgit clone https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude.gitcp ai-marketing-claude/SKILL.MD ~/.claude/skills/zubair-trabzada-ai-marketing-claude-skills-market-report/SKILL.md# Marketing Report Generator (Markdown Format) ## Skill Purpose Generate a comprehensive, professionally formatted marketing report in Markdown. This skill compiles data from all previous audit and analysis results into a single, client-ready document with scores, findings, recommendations, and a prioritized action plan with revenue impact estimates. ## When to Use - User wants a full marketing report for a client or their own business - User has completed one or more audit skills and wants a compiled report - User asks for a marketing assessment, scorecard, or analysis document - Triggered by `/market report` or `/market report <domain>` ## How to Execute ### Step 1: Collect All Available Data Before generating the report, check for any existing audit data from previous skill runs. Look for these files in the project directory: **Possible data sources:** - `MARKETING-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market audit` - `LANDING-CRO.md` -- from `/market landing` - `SEO-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market seo` - `BRAND-VOICE.md` -- from `/market brand` - `COMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md` -- from `/market competitors` - `FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md` -- from `/market funnel` - `CONTENT-AUDIT.md` -- from content analysis - `AD-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market ads` - `SOCIAL-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market social` - `EMAIL-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market emails` If no previous data exists, inform the user and offer to: 1. Run a quick audit first (recommended) 2. Generate a report based on available information (website URL, user-provided data) 3. Create a report template they can fill in ### Step 2: Calculate the Marketing Scorecard Score across 6 categories, each worth up to 100 points. The overall score is the weighted average. #### Category 1: Website & Conversion (Weight: 25%) Evaluate based on landing page analysis, CRO findings, and UX assessment. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Page load speed | 15 | Under 2s = 15, Under 3s = 10, Under 5s = 5, Over 5s = 0 | | Mobile responsiveness | 15 | Fully responsive = 15, Mostly = 10, Partially = 5, Not = 0 | | Clear value proposition | 20 | Immediately clear = 20, Takes effort = 12, Vague = 5, Missing = 0 | | CTA effectiveness | 20 | Strong and clear = 20, Present but weak = 12, Unclear = 5, Missing = 0 | | Social proof | 15 | Multiple types = 15, Some = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Form optimization | 15 | Optimized = 15, Adequate = 10, Needs work = 5, Broken = 0 | #### Category 2: SEO & Organic (Weight: 20%) Evaluate based on SEO audit findings. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Title tags & meta descriptions | 15 | Optimized = 15, Present = 10, Partial = 5, Missing = 0 | | Header hierarchy (H1-H6) | 10 | Proper = 10, Mostly = 7, Needs work = 3, Missing = 0 | | Content quality (E-E-A-T) | 25 | Excellent = 25, Good = 17, Average = 10, Poor = 3 | | Technical SEO | 20 | No issues = 20, Minor issues = 13, Major issues = 7, Critical = 0 | | Internal linking | 15 | Strategic = 15, Present = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Schema markup | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | #### Category 3: Content & Messaging (Weight: 15%) Evaluate based on brand voice analysis and content audit. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Brand voice consistency | 20 | Consistent = 20, Mostly = 13, Inconsistent = 7, No voice = 0 | | Content quality | 25 | Expert-level = 25, Good = 17, Generic = 10, Poor = 3 | | Content variety | 15 | Multiple formats = 15, Some = 10, Limited = 5, Single = 0 | | Publishing frequency | 15 | Regular cadence = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, None = 0 | | Audience targeting | 25 | Precisely targeted = 25, Somewhat = 17, Broad = 10, Off-target = 3 | #### Category 4: Social Media & Community (Weight: 15%) Evaluate based on social media presence and engagement. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Platform presence | 15 | Right platforms, active = 15, Present but inactive = 8, Missing key = 3 | | Content quality | 25 | Engaging and on-brand = 25, Adequate = 15, Low quality = 7, Poor = 0 | | Engagement rate | 25 | Above benchmark = 25, At benchmark = 17, Below = 10, Negligible = 3 | | Posting consistency | 15 | Regular schedule = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, Abandoned = 0 | | Community building | 20 | Active community = 20, Some engagement = 13, Broadcast only = 7, None = 0 | #### Category 5: Email & Automation (Weight: 15%) Evaluate based on email marketing assessment. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | List building mechanism | 20 | Multiple opt-ins = 20, One opt-in = 13, No visible opt-in = 5 | | Email design & content | 20 | Professional and engaging = 20, Adequate = 13, Needs work = 7 | | Automation sequences | 25 | Comprehensive = 25, Basic = 15, Minimal = 8, None = 0 | | Segmentation | 20 | Advanced = 20, Basic = 13, None = 5 | | Deliverability signals | 15 | Strong = 15, Adequate = 10, Concerning = 5, Problems = 0 | #### Category 6: Paid Advertising (Weight: 10%) Evaluate based on ad account audit (if applicable). | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Campaign structure | 20 | Well-organized = 20, Adequate = 13, Messy = 7, None = 0 | | Targeting quality | 25 | Precise and layered = 25, Good = 17, Broad = 10, Wasteful = 3 | | Ad creative quality | 25 | Compelling and varied = 25, Adequate = 17, Weak = 10, Poor = 3 | | Landing page alignment | 15 | Perfect match = 15, Good = 10, Misaligned = 5, Broken = 0 | | Tracking & attribution | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, Missing = 0 | #### Overall Score Calculation ``` Overall Score = (Website * 0.25) + (SEO * 0.20) + (Content * 0.15) + (Social * 0.15) + (Email * 0.15) + (Paid * 0.10) ``` **Score Interpretation:** | Score Range | Rating | Meaning | |---|---|---| | 85-100 | Excellent | Marketing is a competitive advantage. Optimize and scale. | | 70-84 | Good | Solid foundation with clear improvement opportunities. | | 55-69 | Average | Functional but leaving significant growth on the table. | | 40-54 | Below Average | Multiple areas need attention. Significant opportunity cost. | | 0-39 | Critical | Marketing is actively hurting growth. Immediate action required. | ### Step 3: Write Category Deep-Dives For each of the 6 categories, provide: 1. **Score and Rating** -- X/100 with interpretation 2. **Key Findings** -- 3-5 specific observations with evidence 3. **What's Working** -- Positive elements to preserve and build on 4. **Gaps and Issues** -- Problems identified with severity ratings 5. **Recommendations** -- Specific, actionable improvements ranked by impact 6. **Revenue Impact Estimate** -- Estimated financial impact of implementing recommendations **Revenue Impact Estimation Framework:** ``` Impact = (Estimated traffic change * Conversion rate change * Average deal value) * Confidence factor Example: - Current monthly traffic: 10,000 - Recommended SEO improvements could increase traffic 30%: +3,000 visits - Current conversion rate: 2%, CRO could improve to 3%: +1% = +130 conversions - Average deal value: $500 - Estimated monthly revenue impact: $65,000 - Confidence factor (conservative): 0.5 - Conservative estimate: $32,500/month additional revenue ``` ### Step 4: Competitor Comparison Summary If competitor data is available from `/market competitors`, include: **Competitive Positioning Matrix:** | Factor | Client | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Competitor 3 | |---|---|---|---|---| | Website Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | SEO Visibility | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Content Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Social Presence | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Overall Position | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | **Competitive Advantages:** What the client does better **Competitive Gaps:** Where competitors outperform the client **Opportunities:** Spaces competitors are not addressing ### Step 5: Content Quality Assessment Summarize content findings across all channels: - **Website copy** -- Clarity, persuasiveness, brand alignment - **Blog content** -- Depth, expertise, SEO optimization, publishing cadence - **Social media content** -- Engagement quality, brand consistency, platform optimization - **Email content** -- Subject line effectiveness, body copy quality, CTA strength - **Ad creative** -- Messaging clarity, visual quality, offer presentation ### Step 6: Conversion Optimization Summary Compile all conversion-related findings: - **Primary conversion paths** -- How visitors become customers - **Funnel leaks** -- Where potential customers drop off - **CRO quick wins** -- Changes that can be implemented immediately - **Testing opportunities** -- A/B tests recommended with hypotheses - **Benchmark comparison** -- Current rates vs industry standards ### Step 7: SEO Snapshot Summarize SEO health in a scannable format: ``` SEO Health Snapshot: - Title Tags: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing] - Meta Descriptions: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing] - H1 Tags: [Proper / Issues / Missing] - Image Alt Text: [Complete / Partial / Missing] - Page Speed: [Fast / Moderate / Slow] - Mobile-Friendly: [Yes / Partially / No] - Schema Markup: [Present / Partial / Missing] - Robots.txt: [Configured / Issues / Missing] - Sitemap: [Present / Issues / Missing] - HTTPS: [Yes / No] - Core Web Vitals: [Pass / Needs Work / Fail] ``` ### Step 8: Build the Prioritized Action Plan Organize all recommendations into three tiers: #### Quick Wins (Implement This Week) High impact, low effort changes. These should be implementable within 1-5 business days. Format each item as: ``` - [ ] [Action item]: [Specific description] - Impact: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] - Effort: [1-5 hours] - Expected Result: [Specific outcome] - Revenue Impact: [$X/month estimated] ``` #### Medium-Term (Implement This Month) Moderate impact, moderate effort. These require 1-4 weeks. #### Strategic (Implement This Quarter) High impact, high effort. These are foundational changes that require planning and sustained effort. ### Step 9: Build the 30-60-90 Day Roadmap **Days 1-30: Foundation & Quick Wins** - Week 1: Implement all quick wins from the action plan - Week 2: Set up tracking and analytics baseline - Week 3: Begin medium-term improvements - Week 4: First performance review and adjustment **Days 31-60: Growth & Optimization** - Week 5-6: Launch core campaign improvements - Week 7: A/B testing program begins - Week 8: Content strategy implementation **Days 61-90: Scale & Expand** - Week 9-10: Scale what's working, cut what isn't - Week 11: Expand to new channels or campaigns - Week 12: Comprehensive review, update strategy for next quarter ### Step 10: Appendix Include methodology notes so the client understands how scores were derived: **Scoring Methodology:** - How each category was evaluated - Data sources used - Benchmarks referenced - Limitations and assumptions - Date of analysis **Tools Used:** - List any tools or scripts used in the analysis - Reference to scripts/analyze_page.py if used **Glossary:** - Define marketing terms that a non-marketer client may not know - Keep it relevant to terms used in the report ## Output Format Generate a file called `MARKETING-REPORT.md` with: ```markdown # Marketing Report ## [Company/Domain Name] ### Prepared by: [Agent/Agency Name] ### Date: [Date] --- ## Executive Summary ### Overall Marketing Score: [X/100] -- [Rating] [2-3 paragraph summary covering: current state assessment, top 3 findings, estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations, and recommended first steps] ### Score Breakdown | Category | Score | Rating | |---|---|---| | Website & Conversion | X/100 | [Rating] | | SEO & Organic | X/100 | [Rating] | | Content & Messaging | X/100 | [Rating] | | Social Media | X/100 | [Rating] | | Email & Automation | X/100 | [Rating] | | Paid Advertising | X/100 | [Rating] | | **Overall** | **X/100** | **[Rating]** | ### Top 3 Priority Actions 1. [Most impactful recommendation with revenue estimate] 2. [Second most impactful recommendation] 3. [Third most impactful recommendation] --- ## Detailed Findings ### 1. Website & Conversion [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis with findings, what's working, gaps, recommendations] ### 2. SEO & Organic [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 3. Content & Messaging [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 4. Social Media [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 5. Email & Automation [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 6. Paid Advertising [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] --- ## Competitor Comparison [Matrix and analysis] --- ## SEO Snapshot [Health checklist] --- ## Conversion Optimization Summary [Funnel analysis and CRO recommendations] --- ## Revenue Impact Summary | Recommendation | Estimated Monthly Impact | Confidence | Priority | |---|---|---|---| | [Rec 1] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 1 | | [Rec 2] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 2 | | ... | ... | ... | ... | | **Total Estimated Impact** | **$XX,XXX/month** | | | --- ## Prioritized Action Plan ### Quick Wins (This Week) - [ ] [Action items with impact and effort] ### Medium-Term (This Month) - [ ] [Action items] ### Strategic (This Quarter) - [ ] [Action items] --- ## 30-60-90 Day Roadmap [Week-by-week plan] --- ## Appendix ### Methodology ### Tools Used ### Glossary ### Data Sources ``` ## Key Principles - This report should be impressive enough to use as a sales tool. A well-crafted marketing report can open the door to a client engagement. - Always lead with insights and opportunities, not criticism. Frame everything through the lens of growth potential. - Quantify everything possible. "$32,000/month in unrealized revenue" is more compelling than "you're leaving money on the table." - Make the action plan so specific that someone could hand it to a junior marketer and they could execute it. - Use professional formatting: consistent headers, tables for data, checkboxes for action items, clear visual hierarchy. - If data from previous skills is available, reference specific findings. If not, be transparent about what's based on analysis vs estimation. - The report should tell a story: Here's where you are, here's where you could be, here's how to get there, and here's what it's worth.